Mike Dudas

ico dev back in control vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin 1h Expanding on why I believe "ETH as store of value (SoV)" makes much more sense to focus on than "ETH as fee-burning token". Three primary reasons: 1. ETH as fee-burning token never was as strong as it seemed 2. Optimizing for ETH as fee-burning token would demand Ethereum and

"Digital assets now encompass investment funds, stablecoin payments and financial infrastructure involving institutions whose interests outlast any presidency. For an industry seeking customers across the political spectrum, a less partisan identity could ultimately prove an Crypto’s Trump-Fueled Washington Boom Reaches Its Endgame - Bloomberg From archive.ph

imagine you just sold your company for life changing money against the odds, enriching all in your orbit and validating years of massive risk and intense focus, and your lead vc is tone deaf enough to tweet this out Itamar Novick @Itamar_Novick Nov 4 A company in my portfolio just sold for 11.6x what I put in. I wasn't happy about it. That sounds insane, so let me explain how this actually works... I run a pre-seed fund. I'll back 40 companies knowing most of them won't return real money. The math only works if a couple of

crypto was so early based16z @based16z Nov 6 2026 economy makes sense once you understand that a “business” is a marketing function to sell equity and debt, rather than a firm selling products and services to earn profits

California reinvented DAO governance from first principles. Brad Hargreaves @bhargreaves Nov 4 Some dude in California running a 3-person company got voters to give him $4.2 billion by authoring a ballot measure, which passed Quote immad @immad Nov 4 Something feels a bit iffy about California prop 38. Doing a popular vote proposed by a 3 person non-profit that gives said non profit $4.2B from the public! I hope Gary is great and knows how to spend $4.2B well because it’s done.